DSpace@MAKÜ

Ethanolic extract of Turkish bee pollen and propolis: phenolic composition, antiradical, antiproliferative and antibacterial activities

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kahraman, Hatice Ahu en_US
dc.contributor.author Tutun, Hidayet en_US
dc.contributor.author Kaya, Muhammet Mükerrem en_US
dc.contributor.author Usluer, Melike Sultan en_US
dc.contributor.author Tutun, Soner en_US
dc.contributor.author Yaman, Ceren en_US
dc.contributor.author Sevin, Sedat en_US
dc.contributor.author Keyvan, Erhan en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2022-12-28T06:58:59Z en_US
dc.date.available 2022-12-28T06:58:59Z en_US
dc.date.issued 2022-12-31 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1314-3530 en_US
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/11672/4008 en_US
dc.description.abstract Bee pollen and propolis are considered as health-promoting foods with many therapeutic (antibacterial, antifungal and antioxidant) activities. This study analyzed the phenolic profile and the antioxidant properties of Turkish bee pollen and propolis ethanolic extracts and assayed their antiproliferative effect on myeloma cells and in vitro antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The antibacterial activity assays included agar well diffusion and microdilution methods. The phenolic profile and several aromatic compounds of the extracts were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography with diode-array detection (HPLC-DAD). The antiproliferative activity on myeloma cells was determined by MTT test. The propolis extract had higher total phenolic content (TPC), free-radical scavenging activity (DPPH) and half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) than the pollen ethanolic extract. Benzoic and cinnamic acid were the most abundant aromatic substances in the pollen and propolis extracts, respectively. The IC50 values of pollen and propolis extracts on myeloma cells were 1.49% and 2.88%, respectively. The propolis extract was active against S. aureus and E. coli, but not P. aeruginosa. The pollen extract presented no detectable inhibition zone against the three bacterial strains. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of both extracts for S. aureus and E. coli was 0.63% (w/v). The minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of the propolis extract was 1.25% for S. aureus and E. coli. MIC could not be determined for the pollen extract in the tested bacteria. The pollen and propolis extracts did not exert antimicrobial activity against P. aeruginosa up to 2.5% concentration. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Bıotechnology & Bıotechnologıcal Equıpment en_US
dc.relation.isversionof 10.1080/13102818.2022.2045217 en_US
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess en_US
dc.subject Antiradical en_US
dc.subject antibacterial en_US
dc.subject antiproliferative effect en_US
dc.subject bee pollen en_US
dc.subject propolis en_US
dc.subject total phenolic content en_US
dc.title Ethanolic extract of Turkish bee pollen and propolis: phenolic composition, antiradical, antiproliferative and antibacterial activities en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account