Ethanolic extract of Turkish bee pollen and propolis: phenolic composition, antiradical, antiproliferative and antibacterial activities

dc.contributor.authorKahraman, Hatice Ahuen_US
dc.contributor.authorTutun, Hidayeten_US
dc.contributor.authorKaya, Muhammet Mükerremen_US
dc.contributor.authorUsluer, Melike Sultanen_US
dc.contributor.authorTutun, Soneren_US
dc.contributor.authorYaman, Cerenen_US
dc.contributor.authorSevin, Sedaten_US
dc.contributor.authorKeyvan, Erhanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-28T06:58:59Zen_US
dc.date.available2022-12-28T06:58:59Zen_US
dc.date.issued2022-12-31en_US
dc.description.abstractBee pollen and propolis are considered as health-promoting foods with many therapeutic (antibacterial, antifungal and antioxidant) activities. This study analyzed the phenolic profile and the antioxidant properties of Turkish bee pollen and propolis ethanolic extracts and assayed their antiproliferative effect on myeloma cells and in vitro antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The antibacterial activity assays included agar well diffusion and microdilution methods. The phenolic profile and several aromatic compounds of the extracts were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography with diode-array detection (HPLC-DAD). The antiproliferative activity on myeloma cells was determined by MTT test. The propolis extract had higher total phenolic content (TPC), free-radical scavenging activity (DPPH) and half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) than the pollen ethanolic extract. Benzoic and cinnamic acid were the most abundant aromatic substances in the pollen and propolis extracts, respectively. The IC50 values of pollen and propolis extracts on myeloma cells were 1.49% and 2.88%, respectively. The propolis extract was active against S. aureus and E. coli, but not P. aeruginosa. The pollen extract presented no detectable inhibition zone against the three bacterial strains. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of both extracts for S. aureus and E. coli was 0.63% (w/v). The minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of the propolis extract was 1.25% for S. aureus and E. coli. MIC could not be determined for the pollen extract in the tested bacteria. The pollen and propolis extracts did not exert antimicrobial activity against P. aeruginosa up to 2.5% concentration.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1314-3530en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11672/4008en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBıotechnology & Bıotechnologıcal Equıpmenten_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1080/13102818.2022.2045217en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAntiradicalen_US
dc.subjectantibacterialen_US
dc.subjectantiproliferative effecten_US
dc.subjectbee pollenen_US
dc.subjectpropolisen_US
dc.subjecttotal phenolic contenten_US
dc.titleEthanolic extract of Turkish bee pollen and propolis: phenolic composition, antiradical, antiproliferative and antibacterial activitiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Ethanolic extract of Turkish bee pollen and propolis phenolic composition antiradical antiproliferative and antibacterial activities.pdf
Size:
1.47 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections